Оригинална статия Микроикономика

КОНЦЕПТУАЛЕН ИНТЕГРАТИВЕН МОДЕЛ ЗА ЕФЕКТИВНОСТ НА ВИРТУАЛНИТЕ ЕКИПИ

Кристиян Хаджиев - Нов български университет
Получена: 03 юни 2022
Ревизирана:
Публикувана:
Сваляния: 0
Търси по JEL таг 0
Книжка 5/2020
JEL D03 D74 C81
DOI https://doi.org/10.56497/etj2065501

Резюме

Изследвани са ключовите организационни предпоставки, елементи исвойства на виртуалните екипи (входни елементи), основните фактори заефективното им функциониране (процеси) и непосредствените резултатиот дейността на виртуалните структури на базата на съвременнитеинтеграционни модели по схемата „вход-процес-изход". Целта е да сенамери обща теоретична и методологична основа, която да обединявафундаменталните модели за ефективност на виртуалните екипи. Аргумен-тиран е нов концептуален интегративен модел. В матрицата на модела„вход-процес-изход" е предложен различен начини за преобразуване намногостранните връзки и фактори в работещи процеси, което е много по-сложно за постигане във виртуална екипна среда в сравнение с тра-диционната йерархична структура.

Референции

Amrit, C. and J. Van Hillegersberg (2008). Detecting coordination problems in collaborative software development environments. Information Systems Management, 25(1), рр. 57-70.

Baina, K., F. Charoy, C. Godart, D. Grigori, S. E. Hadri, H. Skaf, S. Akifuji, T. Sakaguchi, Y. Seki, and M. Yoshioka (2004). Corvette: a cooperative workflow for virtual teams coordination. International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations, 2(3), рр. 232-245.

Bergenti, F., A. Poggi, and M. Somacher (2002). A collaborative platform for fixed and mobile networks. Communications of the ACM, 45(11), рр. 39-44.

Bettenhausen, K. L. (1991). Five years of groups research: What we have learned and what needs to be addressed. Journal of Management, 17(2).

Bradner, E., G. Mark, and T. D. Hertel (2005). Team size and technology fit: Participation, awareness, and rapport in distributed teams. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 48(1), рр. 68-77.

Campion, M. A., G. I. Medsker, A. C. Higgs (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personal Psychology, 46, рр. 823-850.

Cohen, S. G. (1994). Designing effective self-managing work teams. In: M. M. Beyerlein & D. A. Johnson (еds.). Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams: Theories of self-managing work teams, Vol. 1. Elsevier Science/JAI Press, рр. 67-102.

Ferris, S. P. and M. C. Minielli (2004). Technology and virtual teams. Virtual and Collaborative Teams, 193.

Gaan, N. (2012). Collaborative tools and virtual team effectiveness: an inductively derived approach in India's software sector. Decision, 39(1), рр. 5-27.

Hackman, J. R., C. G. Morris (1975). Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. New York: Academic Press, p. 79.

Hackman, J. R. (1990). Groups that work (and those that don’t). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Gladstein, D. L. (1984). Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(4), рр. 499-517.

Jawadi, N. and N. Boukef Charki (2011). Niveaux de virtualite et performance des equipes: Proposition d'une approche multidimensionnelle d'evaluation. Systemes d'Information & Management, 16(4), рр. 37-72.

Limburg, D. and P. J. Jackson, (2011). Information systems supporting remote control: An evaluation framework. Journal of Organizational Transformation & Social Change, 8(2), рр. 143-161.

Martins, L. L. and M. C. Schilpzand (2011). Global virtual teams: Key developments, research gaps, and future directions. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 30, рр. 1-72.

Massey, A. P. and M. M. Montoya-Weiss (2006). Unraveling the temporal fabric of knowledge conversion: A model of media selection and use. MIS Quarterly, рр. 99-114.

Mihhailova, G., K. Oun, and K. Turk (2011). Virtual work usage and challenges in different service sector branches. Baltic Journal of Management, 6(3), рр. 342356.

Morris, S. (2008). Virtual team working: making it happen. Industrial and Commercial Training, 40(3), рр. 129-133.

Qureshi, S., M. Liu, and D. Vogel (2006). The effects of electronic collaboration in distributed project management. Group Decision and Negotiation, 15(1), рр. 5575.

Rezgui, Y. (2007). Exploring virtual team-working effectiveness in the construction sector. Interacting with Computers, 19(1), рр. 96-112.

Rodnguez, J. P., C. Ebert and A. Vizcaino (2010). Technologies and tools for distributed teams. IEEE Software, 27(5), рр. 10-14.

Sivunen, A. and M. Valo (2006). Team leaders' technology choice in virtual teams. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 49(1), рр. 57-68.

Tannenbaum, S. I., R. L. Beard, E. Sales (1992). Team building and its influence on team effectiveness: An examination of conceptual and empirical developments. New York: Elsevier Science.

Zhuge, H. (2003). Workflow and agent-based cognitive flow management for distributed team cooperation. Information & Management, 40(5), рр. 419-429.


Изисквания за публикуване

Моля, запознайте се с изискванията, преди да продължите

Виж