Оригинална статия Microeconomics

Conceptual integrative model for virtual team effectiveness

Kristiyan Hadzhiev - New Bulgarian University
Received: 03 Jun 2022
Revised:
Published:
Downloads: 0
Citations: 0
Issue 5/2020
JEL D03 D74 C81
DOI https://doi.org/10.56497/etj2065501

Abstract

Researches have been conducted on the key organizational prerequisites, elements and features of virtual teams (input elements), the key factors for their effective functioning (processes) and the immediate results of the activity of the virtual structures on the basis of the contemporary models of integration via the so-called input-process-output (IPO) scheme. The goal is to find a common theoretical and methodical basis that combines the fundamental models for the effectiveness of virtual teams. A new conceptual integrative model has been well-argued. The matrix of the input-process-output (IPO) model offers a different approach for transforming multilateral relations and factors into working processes, which is much more difficult to achieve in a virtual team environment than in a traditional hierarchical structure.

References

Amrit, C. and J. Van Hillegersberg (2008). Detecting coordination problems in collaborative software development environments. Information Systems Management, 25(1), рр. 57-70.

Baina, K., F. Charoy, C. Godart, D. Grigori, S. E. Hadri, H. Skaf, S. Akifuji, T. Sakaguchi, Y. Seki, and M. Yoshioka (2004). Corvette: a cooperative workflow for virtual teams coordination. International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations, 2(3), рр. 232-245.

Bergenti, F., A. Poggi, and M. Somacher (2002). A collaborative platform for fixed and mobile networks. Communications of the ACM, 45(11), рр. 39-44.

Bettenhausen, K. L. (1991). Five years of groups research: What we have learned and what needs to be addressed. Journal of Management, 17(2).

Bradner, E., G. Mark, and T. D. Hertel (2005). Team size and technology fit: Participation, awareness, and rapport in distributed teams. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 48(1), рр. 68-77.

Campion, M. A., G. I. Medsker, A. C. Higgs (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personal Psychology, 46, рр. 823-850.

Cohen, S. G. (1994). Designing effective self-managing work teams. In: M. M. Beyerlein & D. A. Johnson (еds.). Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams: Theories of self-managing work teams, Vol. 1. Elsevier Science/JAI Press, рр. 67-102.

Ferris, S. P. and M. C. Minielli (2004). Technology and virtual teams. Virtual and Collaborative Teams, 193.

Gaan, N. (2012). Collaborative tools and virtual team effectiveness: an inductively derived approach in India's software sector. Decision, 39(1), рр. 5-27.

Hackman, J. R., C. G. Morris (1975). Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. New York: Academic Press, p. 79.

Hackman, J. R. (1990). Groups that work (and those that don’t). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Gladstein, D. L. (1984). Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(4), рр. 499-517.

Jawadi, N. and N. Boukef Charki (2011). Niveaux de virtualite et performance des equipes: Proposition d'une approche multidimensionnelle d'evaluation. Systemes d'Information & Management, 16(4), рр. 37-72.

Limburg, D. and P. J. Jackson, (2011). Information systems supporting remote control: An evaluation framework. Journal of Organizational Transformation & Social Change, 8(2), рр. 143-161.

Martins, L. L. and M. C. Schilpzand (2011). Global virtual teams: Key developments, research gaps, and future directions. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 30, рр. 1-72.

Massey, A. P. and M. M. Montoya-Weiss (2006). Unraveling the temporal fabric of knowledge conversion: A model of media selection and use. MIS Quarterly, рр. 99-114.

Mihhailova, G., K. Oun, and K. Turk (2011). Virtual work usage and challenges in different service sector branches. Baltic Journal of Management, 6(3), рр. 342356.

Morris, S. (2008). Virtual team working: making it happen. Industrial and Commercial Training, 40(3), рр. 129-133.

Qureshi, S., M. Liu, and D. Vogel (2006). The effects of electronic collaboration in distributed project management. Group Decision and Negotiation, 15(1), рр. 5575.

Rezgui, Y. (2007). Exploring virtual team-working effectiveness in the construction sector. Interacting with Computers, 19(1), рр. 96-112.

Rodnguez, J. P., C. Ebert and A. Vizcaino (2010). Technologies and tools for distributed teams. IEEE Software, 27(5), рр. 10-14.

Sivunen, A. and M. Valo (2006). Team leaders' technology choice in virtual teams. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 49(1), рр. 57-68.

Tannenbaum, S. I., R. L. Beard, E. Sales (1992). Team building and its influence on team effectiveness: An examination of conceptual and empirical developments. New York: Elsevier Science.

Zhuge, H. (2003). Workflow and agent-based cognitive flow management for distributed team cooperation. Information & Management, 40(5), рр. 419-429.


How to publish

Are you an author? Please read our publishing terms first.

Learn